The Forest of Hands and Teeth by Carrie Ryan
My rating: 3 of 5 stars
It’s difficult for me to review Carrie Ryan’s first novel, The Forest of Hands and Teeth objectively–because I can’t help but feel like there were two very different books packed into the volume’s three-hundred-some-odd pages.
The first was the delicately story that was clearly and wisely aimed at young adults: that of Mary, who lives in a village isolated from the rest of the world thanks to a zombie plague that rages outside its gates. In this tale, when Mary’s parents become infected, and the man who previously expressed an intention to court her turns her back on her, she is forced to join the mysterious Sisterhood, a religious organization that rules the village and guides its inhabitants through every stage of their carefully controlled lives.
In the second tale, Mary flees the village with a handful of people, including two brothers who both love her. Though ostensibly the more action-packed of the two stories, as Mary and her band struggle to reach the coast, this is largely a meditation on marriage and commitment, and on the sacrifices we are forced to make when we promise ourselves to someone else.
You might be surprised to learn that I found the first story here far more successful than the second.
Within the novel’s first third, I found Ryan’s prose particularly beautiful and captivating. Mary’s story was told with a delicate touch, and the poetic, slightly archaic tone only complimented the rich post-apocalyptic setting. The world within the village reminded me of the similar dystopia found in John Christopher’s Tripod series at least as much as it was redolent of M. Night Shyamalan’s The Village. Seemingly medieval, seemingly peaceful and simple, this setting only made the horrors that Mary experienced in her life in the Sisterhood that much more terrifying. I read quickly, and was deeply absorbed: I wanted to discover the secrets of Mary’s world just as much as Mary did. Though I was troubled by her dithering affections for two fairly flat men, Travis and Harry, it seemed clear to me that this bland love triangle was subordinate to the drama of Mary’s life in the Cathedral.
I was unfortunately wrong about that.
The second half of the novel, which follows Mary’s progress through the eponymous forest along with her band of relatives and suitors, was almost entirely about this love triangle. The mysteries of the Sisterhood are unsummarily dismissed in favor of questions which I frankly found less compelling: Why is Gabrielle different from the other zombies? Will Mary ever learn to read Roman numerals? Will she choose Harry or Travis? Concerning the last “mystery,” Mary waffles between the brothers several times, even if through most of the novel both men are bland ciphers, totally lacking in personality.
We finally do get a conversation–just one–with Travis around page 220 of the book where we start learning why he’s drawn to Mary and what might, conceivably, make him a sympathetic and compelling love interest. This is during a long stretch of the novel where we’re plunged into a domestic setting. Mary seems to have chosen Travis, and they’re trying to make a life together despite the fact that they were both betrothed to others, and despite the fact that Mary’s true passions will always lie elsewhere. The idea of this theme interested me, even if I didn’t find it quite as juicy as the book’s first half. Unfortunately, I found the execution a bit shallow and cursory.
I think this may be the nature of the beast, when you make marriage and commitment and the choices we make when promising ourselves to others the centerpiece of a novel aimed at teenagers. That’s not to say that I think that teenagers are incapable of understanding these themes, but more to say that many just aren’t interested in them–I know I wasn’t back then. And the brevity of this plot line does these themes a fundamental disservice. Had Ryan been writing a longer book, one aimed (say) at adult women, rather than at teenage girls, she would have had more room to explore the issues surrounding Mary’s commitments in-depth. The men in question could have been rendered more vividly and completely. And I would have felt more engaged with the issue of her choice.
But as it stood, I never really cared that deeply at all. Certainly not the way I did during the beginning of the novel, when our primary question was What’s going on here? rather than Who will she choose?
In the end, I can’t help but wish that this had been two books: the first, a riveting YA novel exploring an oppressive religious organization that took advantage of man’s vulnerability during the zombie apocalypse, featuring Mary, our curious and determined heroine. And a second book–longer, quieter even when the zombies intruded, which focused on Mary-the-woman, rather than Mary-the-girl, and explored the sacrifices, romantic or not, that adults make during desperate times.

Agreed! I felt like the first half of the novel was really interesting, and I wanted to learn more about the Sisterhood and what was happening in her village, but that was all simply dismissed by the zombie invasion. I think the author tried to do too much in one novel, rather than fixating on one of the many ideas and themes she wanted to explore.
And I especially disliked the domestic section. It just felt so jarringly out-of-place from the rest of the novel. Maybe that’s just me…
Definitely! I think the novel should have been at least twice as long to properly develop all the plot points she introduced. OR, if she’d just focused on the Sisterhood, perhaps could have made it a nice, claustrophobic story–something a bit like Margaret Atwood’s Handmaid’s Tale.
So it definitely wasn’t just you . . .
So I’m going to say that I never really thought that the whole love triangle thing you’re speaking of was a central theme. We always knew that she loved the one guy more than the other (sorry, it’s been a while and I can’t remember their names), we always knew that he was the one she wanted. For me the whole book was about Mary looking outside of her sheltered life for something more – something beyond the fence, something different than what was expected of her. The ocean represented her going out in the real world to discover what was out there – which is something that I think teenagers can relate to especially as they’re starting college and work life. The domestic scene, I actually kind of liked. She was getting a taste of what her life could have been like if the fence hadn’t been breached, even though it was short-lived and we knew it wouldn’t last. Teens generally make one choice that sets the direction of their lives and they don’t get a chance to see what the other choice could have brought. But in this case it was kind of like Mary got that chance. It also didn’t bother me that the thing with the sisters was never sorted out. I know others who’ve said that the story lacked plot because of that, but for me it was a character driven novel rather than plot driven. It was about Mary’s character and her coming of age rather than a story about the society that had developed. Anyway, those are my thoughts. Thanks for the review!
Thanks for the comment, Angie!
I’d actually agree that it was character-driven, rather than plot-driven. But if, as you say, Mary’s choice was always clear, then (especially as it was told from a first-person perspective), it really should have been more clear to us why Travis (the brother she liked more) was such a superior choice to Harry. She tells us from the outset that he is, but doesn’t give us a reason. Is he cuter than Harry? Kinder? More noble? Ryan actually gives Harry a few more redeemable qualities than she does Travis until pretty far into the book–he comes across as a pretty endearing character in the opening scene, and in those just before their intended marriage.
I like your metaphoric take of the ocean, though. I’m not entirely convinced that Ryan developed this sufficiently for it to be really supported by the text–her longing for the ocean is so vague and undefined, and really no better developed than the love triangle aspects. But I still think it’s an astute reading.
Interesting review. I enjoyed reading it. You had many great points, and you explained why you felt that way, which is what made this review so great.
Thanks for it!
Thank you!
Hey
I liked reading your review. It was interesting to read about your reactions.
I love this book (I’m a 5 stars fan). I know what you mean about it being like 2 books. In my mind I definitely divide it into two parts as well, but I found both equally compelling.
I liked the sequel as well, but had niggling thoughts about a number of things in it – probably very similar to how you’ve felt about this one
The sequel does a similar thing – shifts focus half-way through. I still gave it four as I can help but like the world she has created. it also has a (rather unsuccessful) love triangle, although the two boys in it are much more fleshed out and appealing than the first one.
I might still read the sequel, since I’ve heard it does similar things but better. Nice to hear that the characterization of the love interests is one of those things!
You’ve pinpointed several of the problems I had with the book, especially the handwaving of the interesting mysteries at the heart of the Sisterhood/continued zombie problem. One thing I found particularly irritating about this was Ryan’s refusal to engage fully with this idea of religious oppression. The scripture referred to is never identified specifically as Christian, nor is the Bible quoted anywhere despite Mary coming across various carved inscriptions. Moreover, the nature of the Sisterhood’s meddling is never fully revealed. I found this frustrating.
As for the domestic portion, I found this fairly dull. I see what you mean about the theme of commitment, and I thought it was daring of Ryan to imply that Mary had begun a sexual relationship with Harry before moving over to Travis. Despite this that segment dragged for me.
I found this interesting and wondered if this had anything to do with the audience, too–there’s always so much controversy that surrounds any message that could feasibly be taken as anti-Christian in “children’s books.” While that controversy exists in adult lit, it’s not present with nearly the same amount of fervor. Perhaps she was afraid of offending someone.
I totally gave you an award, even though other people have already given it to you